Every drainage strategy submitted to a lead local flood authority in England now has to show that the 1 in 100 year storm, uplifted for climate change, is held on site and released at a rate the receiving system can take. Since May 2022 the uplift is no longer a single national figure but a table of allowances by management catchment, epoch and percentile, and the choice between a 20 percent central and a 45 percent upper end value can change a tank volume by half. This guide explains where the allowances come from, how they combine with FEH rainfall, critical duration analysis and the Defra non-statutory standards, and works a tank sizing from greenfield rate to half-drain time.
The standards the design must satisfy
Defra’s 2015 non-statutory technical standards (NSTS) are the baseline that planning conditions and LLFA guidance reference. S2 requires greenfield developments to discharge no more than the greenfield peak rate for the 1 in 1 year and 1 in 100 year events; S3 allows brownfield sites to discharge no more than the pre-development rate, but as close to greenfield as is reasonably practicable. S4 and S5 control volume for the 1 in 100 year, 6 hour event, and S6 allows a controlled slow release where volume cannot be matched. S7 bars flooding anywhere on site in the 1 in 30 year event, S8 bars flooding of buildings and vulnerable plant such as pumping stations and substations in the 1 in 100 year event, and S9 requires exceedance routes above that. Local guides tighten these: Suffolk’s LLFA, for example, prefers discharge at QBAR rather than the event-specific greenfield rate, asks for a minimum 30 percent betterment on brownfield sites for the 1 hour storm, adds 10 percent for urban creep on residential impermeable areas, sets a 100 mm minimum orifice on small sites, requires 5 mm interception storage, and asks for storage to half-drain within 24 hours after the 1 in 30 year plus climate change event.
Planning policy background, including the NPPF sequential tests, is covered in the surface water runoff and SuDS guide; this article concentrates on the numbers.
Where the climate change allowances come from
Environment Agency guidance on flood risk assessment climate change allowances was updated on 10 May 2022 to replace the former national peak rainfall uplifts (20 to 40 percent) with values derived from the Met Office UKCP Local 2.2 km convection-permitting projections and the Newcastle University FUTURE-DRAINAGE ensemble. Allowances are given for each of around 100 management catchments in England, for the 3.3 percent and 1 percent annual exceedance probability events, for two epochs (2050s covering 2022 to 2060 and 2070s covering 2061 to 2125) and at two percentiles of the high emissions ensemble: central (50th percentile) and upper end (95th percentile). Guidance is to use the central allowance for development with a lifetime to 2100 and the upper end for lifetimes to 2125, with the upper end also used for essential infrastructure and where a credible maximum scenario is required.
| Management catchment | 2050s central, 1% AEP | 2050s upper, 1% AEP | 2070s central, 1% AEP | 2070s upper, 1% AEP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Suffolk (Anglian) | 20% | 45% | 20% | 40% |
| Cam and Ely Ouse (Anglian) | 20% | 40% | 25% | 40% |
| Colne (Thames) | 20% | 40% | 25% | 40% |
| Severn Uplands | 25% | 40% | 30% | 45% |
| Tyne (Northumbria) | 25% | 40% | 35% | 45% |
| Kent and Leven, Lune (North West) | 25% | 45% | 35% | 50% |
Two points catch designers out. First, the 3.3 percent AEP allowances are often the same or 5 percentage points lower than the 1 percent values, so the S7 check on the 1 in 30 year event needs its own uplift from the table rather than the 1 in 100 year figure. Second, the allowances are uplifts to rainfall intensity across all durations, applied to the FEH depth-duration-frequency estimate; they are not applied to the greenfield discharge rate, which is calculated without climate change. Because the allowable outflow stays fixed while the inflow grows, the storage volume grows by more than the percentage uplift, as the worked example shows. Suffolk’s 2023 guide adopts 45 percent for residential development with a 100 year lifetime, the upper end 2050s value for its catchments, and notes that the online table takes precedence whenever it is updated.
Rainfall, runoff and the critical duration
Design rainfall comes from the FEH web service as a depth-duration-frequency (DDF) model for the site centroid, using the FEH13 model for return periods of 2 years and above and, by convention, the older FSR profile for the 1 in 1 year check because FEH13 is less reliable for frequent events. Hydraulic models apply summer and winter storm profiles across a range of durations, typically 15 minutes to 48 hours, and the critical duration is whichever produces the largest storage requirement for the chosen outflow. Short storms govern where the outflow is a large fraction of peak inflow; long storms govern where the outflow is small relative to the site, which is the usual case once discharge is throttled to greenfield rates. Greenfield rates for sites under 50 hectares are estimated by the IH 124 or ReFH2 methods on the positively drained area only, without any climate uplift:
For a 50 ha catchment in East Anglia with SAAR 600 mm and SOIL 0.30: QBAR = 0.00108 × 0.540 × 1,779 × 0.0733 = 0.076 m³/s, i.e. 1.5 L/s/ha. Q1 is about 0.85 QBAR, Q30 about 2.3 QBAR and Q100 about 3.2 QBAR for the FSR regional growth curves.
Runoff from impermeable area is taken at a volumetric coefficient of 1.0 in most LLFA guides, so a hectare of roof or hardstanding yields 10 m³ per millimetre of rain. Permeable surfaces are either excluded from the network or given a runoff coefficient from the soil type.
Worked tank sizing
Site: 2.0 ha greenfield in the East Suffolk catchment, residential, 100 year lifetime; 1.2 ha impermeable plus 10 percent urban creep = 1.32 ha; QBAR for the whole site at 1.5 L/s/ha = 3 L/s, raised to 5 L/s by the 100 mm minimum orifice (a hydro-brake would allow the lower value). Allowance: 40 percent (2070s upper end, 1 percent AEP), the value for a lifetime to 2125; a 2050s central design at 20 percent is shown for comparison. FEH13 1 in 100 year depths for the site centroid are taken as 45, 55, 72, 85, 100 and 120 mm for 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hour durations. A first-pass storage estimate ignores drain-down during the storm beyond the controlled outflow:
with V in m³, A in ha, R in mm, Qout in L/s and D in hours.
| Duration | Rain +40% (mm) | Inflow (m³) | Outflow (m³) | Storage (m³) | Storage at +20% (m³) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h | 63 | 832 | 18 | 814 | 695 |
| 6 h | 101 | 1,331 | 108 | 1,223 | 1,032 |
| 12 h | 119 | 1,571 | 216 | 1,355 | 1,130 |
| 24 h | 140 | 1,848 | 432 | 1,416 | 1,152 |
| 48 h | 168 | 2,218 | 864 | 1,354 | 1,037 |
Critical duration is 24 hours at this low outflow, and the tank needs about 1,420 m³ at the 40 percent allowance against 1,150 m³ at 20 percent and 890 m³ with no uplift. A 40 percent rainfall uplift has therefore produced a 59 percent increase in storage, because the outflow term does not grow. Half-drain check: Suffolk asks that storage half-empties within 24 hours after the 1 in 30 year plus climate change storm. With a 24 hour 1 in 30 year depth of 75 mm uplifted to 105 mm the stored volume is 954 m³, and 477 m³ at 5 L/s takes 26.5 hours: a marginal failure, resolved by splitting the outflow between the throttle and an infiltration trench, or by accepting a modest increase in discharge rate with the LLFA. Long-term storage under S4 is also needed because the site discharges above QBAR: the 1 in 100 year 6 hour developed volume of 1,331 m³ less the greenfield volume of about 600 m³ (2 ha at 101 mm and 30 percent runoff) leaves roughly 730 m³ to be infiltrated or released at 2 L/s/ha. Finally the 1 in 30 year on-site flooding check (S7) and the 1 in 100 year building check (S8) are run in the model with their own allowances, and exceedance routes mapped.
A full hydraulic model with FEH13 summer and winter profiles and 15 minute to 48 hour durations will trim these hand figures by 10 to 20 percent, because outflow continues through the recession limb and the design storm profile peaks rather than being uniform. Hand calculation remains worthwhile as a check: a model result far from it usually means an area, coefficient or allowance has been entered wrongly.
Attenuation for treatment plant and construction sites
Sewage and water treatment sites attract the S8 condition explicitly, since pumping stations, MCCs and chemical stores are named as plant susceptible to water. Hardstanding fractions are high, so impermeable area approaches the whole site and storage volumes per hectare are large; roof water from packaged plant rooms and kiosks should be collected separately from process areas so that it can go to infiltration or a clean outfall rather than through the works drainage. Contaminated-yard drainage is a separate system with interceptors and, where chemicals are stored, bunded or valved isolation, and its attenuation must still satisfy the same rate limits.
Temporary works are often overlooked. A construction site stripped of topsoil runs off at close to impermeable rates for two or three years, and silt-laden runoff is the commonest pollution incident on new developments. Temporary lagoons sized on the same 1 in 30 year plus allowance basis, with the long storm governing, and with a silt treatment step before discharge, meet both the flood and the water quality obligations under the Environment Agency regulatory position statements for construction water. Where a tide-locked or surcharged outfall is possible, storage must cover the coincident 1 in 30 year pluvial event with the outfall closed, which can double the volume again.
Pitfalls
- Wrong epoch or percentile. Residential lifetimes are taken as 100 years, which now pushes designs into the 2070s epoch and, for lifetimes beyond 2100, the upper end allowance. Commercial units with 60 year lifetimes can use the 2050s central value and save a third of the storage.
- Applying the uplift to the greenfield rate. Greenfield rates are calculated without climate change; uplifting them inflates the allowable discharge and understates storage.
- Short duration bias. Models run only to 6 hours miss the critical duration at low outflows; run to 48 hours, or longer where tide locking applies.
- Orifice blockage. Below 100 mm the throttle blocks; vortex controls deliver a lower rate at a larger opening and are worth the cost on sites where QBAR is under 5 L/s.
- Neighbouring catchment. Where the dominant source of flood risk lies in an adjacent management catchment, the EA expects that catchment’s allowance to be used.
- Silt and void ratios. Geocellular crates are 95 percent void, stone-filled trenches 30 percent; add 10 percent storage for silt in tanks and verify the half-drain time with the final geometry.
Frequently asked questions
What climate change allowance should I use for a SuDS design in England?
Look up the management catchment in the Environment Agency peak rainfall table. Use the central allowance (typically 20 to 35 percent) for development with a lifetime to 2100 and the upper end allowance (typically 35 to 50 percent) for lifetimes to 2125 or essential infrastructure, selecting the 2050s or 2070s epoch to match the lifetime, and the 1 percent or 3.3 percent AEP figure to match the event being checked.
Why does a 40 percent rainfall uplift increase my tank by more than 40 percent?
Because the uplift applies to the inflow while the permitted outflow, calculated at greenfield rates without climate change, stays the same. Storage is inflow minus outflow over the storm, so the difference grows faster than the inflow; in the worked example a 40 percent uplift raised storage by 59 percent.
What is the critical duration of a storm for attenuation design?
The storm duration that produces the largest storage requirement for the chosen outflow. With discharge throttled to greenfield rates of a few litres per second it is usually 12 to 48 hours, so models must be run across the full range of durations rather than stopping at a few hours.
How quickly must an attenuation tank drain down?
Many LLFAs, Suffolk among them, require storage to half-empty within 24 hours after the 1 in 30 year plus climate change storm so that capacity is available for a following event. Where the throttle is set at a few litres per second this criterion, not the 1 in 100 year volume, can govern the design.
Sources & further reading
- Environment Agency, Flood risk assessments: climate change allowances (gov.uk guidance, peak rainfall section updated May 2022)
- Environment Agency, Peak rainfall climate change allowances by management catchment (data table, version 21 March 2022)
- Defra, Sustainable drainage systems: non-statutory technical standards for sustainable drainage systems (March 2015)
- Suffolk County Council, Suffolk Flood Risk Management Strategy, Appendix A: SuDS Local Design Guide (2023 update)
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, FEH Web Service (FEH13 rainfall DDF model and catchment descriptors)
- CIRIA C753, The SuDS Manual (2015), chapters 24 and 25 on design storms, greenfield runoff and storage